Preview

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics

Advanced search

Bioequivalence study of fixed-dose combination Losartan + amlodipine + rosuvastatin Sanofi in comparison with coadministered fixed- dose combination Lozap® AM and monocomponent drug Crestor® in healthy subjects

https://doi.org/10.37489/2587-7836-2022-1-61-74

Abstract

   Introduction. The advantages of fixed-dose combination losartan + amlodipine + rosuvastatin compared to mono-drugs and two-component combinations are to increase the therapeutic efficacy, to reduce the cost of the product and to make the drug easier to take which helps to improve patient adherence to therapy. A bioequivalence study of the three-component fixed-dose combinations Losartan + amlodipine + rosuvastatin Sanofi with coadministered Lozap® AM (Losartan+Amlodipine) and Crestor® (Rosuvastatin) was conducted.

   Aim. The purpose of the bioequivalence trial was a comparative study of the pharmacokinetics and evidence of the bioequivalence of two strengths of fixed-dose combination: 1) Losartan + amlodipine + rosuvastatin Sanofi (tablets, 50 mg + 5 mg + 10 mg) in comparison with coadministrated drugs Lozap® AM (losartan + amlodipine, tablets, 50 mg + 5 mg,) and Crestor® (rosuvastatin, tablets, 10 mg) in fasting healthy volunteers after a single administration; 2) Losartan + amlodipine + rosuvastatin Sanofi (tablets, 100 mg + 5 mg + 20 mg) in comparison with coadministrated drugs Lozap® AM (losartan + amlodipine, tablets, 100 mg + 5 mg) and Crestor® (rosuvastatin, tablets, 20 mg) in fasting healthy volunteers 18–45 years old after a single dose.

   Materials and methods. To prove bioequivalence, an open label, comparative, randomized, crossover four-period clinical trial was conducted for each strengths of fixed-dose combination. The concentrations of losartan, amlodipine and rosuvastatin in blood plasma samples obtained from volunteers were determined by a validated HPLC-MS/MS method. A pharmacokinetic and statistical analysis was performed and confidence intervals (CI) for the pharmacokinetic parameters Сmax, AUC0-72 (for amlodipine) and AUC0-t (for losartan and rosuvastatin) were calculated.   
   Results and discussion. Based on the results of statistical and pharmacokinetic analysis, it was shown that the studied formulations are bioequivalent in terms of pharmacokinetic parameters of losartan, amlodipine and rosuvastatin. 90 % CI were in the acceptable range for Сmax (of amlodipine), AUC0-72 (of amlodipine) and AUC0-t (of losartan and rosuvastatin). 90 % CI for Сmax of losartan and rosuvastatin were in the acceptable extended calculated range according to the protocol.

   Conclusion. Thus, according to the criteria used in the studies, the three-component fixed-dose combinations Losartan + amlodipine + rosuvastatin Sanofi are proved to be bioequivalent in comparison with coadministered Lozap® AM and Crestor®.

About the Authors

A. L. Khokhlov
Ministry of Health of Russia; Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Alexander L. Khokhlov, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Corresponding Member, Head of the Department 

Yaroslavl State Medical University

Department of the Clinical Pharmacology

SPIN code: 9389-8926

Yaroslavl



D. Yu. Grebenkin
LLC ExacteLabs
Russian Federation

Dmitry Yu. Grebenkin, Cand. Sci. Pharm., Head of the laboratory

farmanalysis laboratory

Moscow



E. K. Faeva
LLC ExacteLabs
Russian Federation

Ekaterina K. Faeva, laboratory assistant

Moscow



V. I. Kazey
LLC ExacteLabs
Russian Federation

Vasily I. Kazey, Cand. Sci. Biology., general manager

SPIN code: 6253-0211

Moscow



A. A. Khokhlov
LLC ClinPharmInvest
Russian Federation

Alexander A. Khokhlov, Cand. Sci. Med., clinical trials manager

Yaroslavl



A. E. Miroshnikov
LLC ClinPharmInvest
Russian Federation

Alexei E. Miroshnikov, Cand. Sci. Med.

SPIN code: 8896-8993

Yaroslavl



O. V. Lebedeva
Representative office of Sanofi (France)
Russian Federation

Olga V. Lebedeva, PhD, clinical project leader

Moscow



References

1. Harikrishnan S., Jeemon P., Mini G.K., Thankappan K. R. et al. GBD 2017 Causes of Death Collaborators. Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality for 282 causes of death in 195 countries and territories, 1980-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018; 392 (10159): 1736–1788. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32203-7.

2. Kotseva K., De Backer G., De Bacquer D., Rydén L. et al. Lifestyle and impact on cardiovascular risk factor control in coronary patients across 27 countries: Results from the European Society of Cardiology ESC-EORP EUROASPIRE V registry. European journal of preventive cardiology. 2019; 26 (8): 824–835. DOI: 10.1177/2047487318825350.

3. Dresser G. K., Nelson S. A., Mahon J. L., Zou G. et al. Simplified therapeutic intervention to control hypertension and hypercholesterolemia: a cluster randomized controlled trial (STITCH2). J Hypertens. 2013; 31 (8): 1702–1713. DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283619d6a.

4. Sniderman A. D., Williams K., Contois J. H., Monroe H. M. et al. A meta-analysis of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B as markers of cardiovascular risk. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2011;4 (3): 337–345. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.110.959247.

5. Satoh M., Ohkubo T., Asayama K., Murakami Y. et al. Combined effect of blood pressure and total cholesterol levels on long-term risks of subtypes of cardiovascular death: evidence for cardiovascular prevention from observational cohorts in Japan. Hypertension. 2015; 65 (3): 517–524. DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.04639.

6. Weber M. Clinical safety and tolerability of losartan. Clin ther. 1997; 19 (4): 604–616. DOI: 10.1016/S0149-2918(97)80086-0.

7. Wadhera R. K., Steen D. L., Khan I., Giugliano R. P. et al. A review of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, treatment strategies, and its impact on cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality. J clin Lipidol. 2016; 10 (3): 472–489. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacl.2015.11.010.

8. Grundy S. M., Stone N. J., Bailey A. L., Beam C. et al. AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC /NLA/PCNA guideline on the management of blood cholesterol: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidlenes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019; 73 (24); e285–e350. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.003.

9. Carter N. J. Rosuvastatin. American journal of cardiovascular drugs. 2010; 10 (6): 383–400.

10. Valcarcel Y., Jimenez R., Hernandez V., Aristegui R., Gil A. Efficacy and safety of amlodipine. Clin Drug Investig. 2006; 26 (3): 125–133. DOI: 10.2165/00044011-200626030-00002.

11. Lee H. Y., Kim S. Y., Choi K. J., Yoo B. S. et al. A randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and the tolerability of a triple combination of amlodipine/losartan/rosuvastatin in patients with comorbid essential hypertension and hyperlipidemia. Clin Ther. 2017; 39 (12): 2366–2379. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.10.013.

12. Mitra A., Wu Y. Challenges and opportunities in achieving bioequivalence for fixed-dose combination products. AAPS J. 2012; 14 (3): 646–655. DOI: 10.1208/s12248-012-9378-x.

13. Dubey R. Bioequivalence challenges in development of fixed-dose combination products: looking beyond reformulation. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2012; 9 (3): 325–332. DOI: 10.1517/17425247.2012.655723.

14. Миронов А. Н. Руководство по экспертизе лекарственных средств. Т. I / А. Н. Миронов. – М.: Гриф и К; 2013. – 280. [Mironov A. N. Rukovodstvo po ekspertize lekarstvennyh sredstv. T. I. Moscow: Grif and K; 2013. (In Russ).].

15. Правила проведения исследований биоэквивалентности лекарственных средств Евразийского экономического союза. – 2016. [Pravila provedeniya issledovanij bioekvivalentnosti lekarstvennyh sredstv Evrazijskogo ekonomicheskogo soyuza. 2016. (In Russ).].


Review

For citations:


Khokhlov A.L., Grebenkin D.Yu., Faeva E.K., Kazey V.I., Khokhlov A.A., Miroshnikov A.E., Lebedeva O.V. Bioequivalence study of fixed-dose combination Losartan + amlodipine + rosuvastatin Sanofi in comparison with coadministered fixed- dose combination Lozap® AM and monocomponent drug Crestor® in healthy subjects. Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics. 2022;(1):61-74. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37489/2587-7836-2022-1-61-74

Views: 2008


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2587-7836 (Print)
ISSN 2686-8830 (Online)